Tattoo You.

Skipping through the music channels on TV at the weekend, I landed on this classic track. Recorded ‘live’ on the 24th February 1969, in California’s notorious San Quentin jail, the song has always been one of my favourites by Johnny Cash. I must have watched this video many, many times before, but it was only on Saturday evening that I noticed something odd.

Have a look at the prison inmates. Notice anything?

No tattoos!

Without exception, everyone is devoid of body decoration.

Changed days indeed. A study has found that in USA now, 70% of prisoners have at least one tattoo, with 41% acquiring one / an additional one during their spell of incarceration.

Although the trend to self-expression through body-art became more commonplace through the late-Sixties and Seventies, as a ten-year-old kid of that time, I was always given to believe tattoos were the identifiers of either sailors or criminals.  You know, an anchor and a girl’s name inked onto forearm, or a swallow etched onto the back of a hand. That kind of thing.

Despite their growing popularity, tattoos never-the-less carried a stigma. And so, like in my household, we children of the Sixties / Seventies were subjected to parental lectures, warning of forcible amputation should we have our friends conduct some amateur inking on our bodies.

Of course, some youngsters did suffer, through infection as well as the wrath of their mums and dads, by declaring their ‘individuality’ on their skin. Even those who considered it a clever means of escaping punishment by having the words ‘MUM’ and ‘DAD’ scrawled onto their knuckles paid a heavy price.

What was acceptable though, and proved very popular amongst youngsters, were the ‘temporary tattoos’ or ‘transfers’ that could be bought in newsagents, sweetshops and in some cases came with packs of bubblegum. Bazooka Joe comes to mind.  

Initially produced using food-colouring dyes, these temporary tattoos had been around since the late 1800s. However, with the advent of ‘pop culture’ and the transfers becoming collectables (rather than being used for skin decoration) a move was made away from the biodegradable food-dyes to a more durable, yet safe ink.

Manufacturers would produce transfers for all the popular children’s cartoons and superheroes of the day. Batman, Superman, Stingray, The Lone Ranger etc. In the Seventies, I recall there being David Cassidy transfers. Donny Osmond, David Essex, Marc Bolan – they were all available. Indeed, Bolan, together with the band, Sweet, were wonderful adverts for these tattoos, sporting them through their television performances.

If I remember correctly, these temporary tatts came on sheets of especially absorbent paper. You’d cut out the transfer you wanted to wear, wet your arm, or wherever, and then press the image against your skin. You’d have remain motionless for thirty seconds or so, before slowly, very slowly, peeling the paper away, leaving the colourful image on display.

There was a knack to it, though. If you peeled the paper too early, or pressed so hard that it slipped, you were left with a partial or smudged tattoo. Wait too long before peeling, your skin would dry out, leaving part of the image on the paper when you removed it.

Nowadays, tattoos are of course widely accepted, though it was only in 2014 The British Army allowed them, provided they were not visible in a standard, passport-sized head and open-neck photograph. Similarly, from the following year, police forces around the UK began to accept them.

I can understand the reasons for our parents doing all they could to stop us inking-up as youngsters. Yet I do wonder if by encouraging us instead to cover our arms with images of television and pop-star heroes, they eventually drove us to more permanent markings as we grew older.

I have one thing in common with the jailbirds of San Quentin – I don’t have any tattoos. I doubt I ever will. If I did though, one would likely be a red coloured, Rolling Stones lips and tongue image above my puny bicep. Or perhaps, The Exploited’s skull logo – that’d be pretty cool. Maybe I’d have one on each shoulder.

(Pic from @baldotattoo Instagram)

I’m sure I’d still get a good talking-to from my 95-year old parents!

(What is / would be your favourite piece of body-art?)

(Well … it would’ve rude not to, wouldn’t it? I know, I know – any excuse! 😉 😀 )

(Post by Colin ‘Jackie’ Jackson from Glasgow – June 2025)


Discover more from

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

6 comments

    • Cheers, Randy
      Yeah – I think the difference these days is that it IS a form of art. The designs are far more professional, colourful and meaningful, at least to the individual.

      My younger son is covered! 🙂

      Liked by 1 person

  1. times definitely have changed. It was this century that in baseball, a Toronto pitcher was forced to leave the field and go put on a long sleeved shirt underneath his jersey because the umpire found his tattoos distracting. Now most players seem to have fingernail to shoulder tattoos. I’ve never cared for them much, maybe because of my parents’ influence and when I grew up – only tough guys and bikers had ’em (and having one meant they were going to be tested on how tough they really were on a routine basis) and only biker chick’s among the females. Now, obviously, many people of all walks of life do. I continue to assert my own individuality and rebelliousness by not having any though. The temporary tattoo transfers were OK though… and fortuitous I guess if you were a big DAvid Cassidy fan in the early ’70s. Wonder how many old-timers are walking around with faded pictures of his face on their arm?

    Liked by 1 person

    • You’re SO right! 😀

      You’d probably get away with your football / baseball team tattoos coz you’re most unlikely to change your affiliation – but as we all know, musical tastes change as we get older.

      (I like the idea that us un-tattooed folks are now considered the rebels! 😀

      Like

  2. Great post Jackie, I didn’t know anyone with a tattoo when I was 16 and I’m not sure when it transformed into body art and developed into face and neck tattoos, I just take it as a sign that I’m getting old….

    Liked by 1 person

    • Face and neck tats, I’m not so sure on. Though that said, when I was going to lots of punk gigs in the early to mid 2000s, I met loads of bands and fans who sported plenty of them. In that environment, they looked pretty cool, I have to say.

      But, nah – not for me either. 🙂

      Like

Leave a comment